

Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 7:26
|

|
|
|
|
|
|

Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 7:39
|

|
|
|
|
|
|




Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 8:15
|

|
|
|
|
|
|

Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 8:22
|

|
|
wanderful posts:
| wanderful wrote: | OK, I'm going to say soft. But that no-vold thing has shaken my confidence a little bit, so I'm going to hedge my bets a bit and say possibly common, as well.

Do you have an impression for essence name? Have we missed any stats? |
Now I'm thinking intermediate. The "exchange" thing is throwing me for the soft, I think of myself as more of a stubborn individualist. I've always thought of myself as more emotional/intuitive than rational/thought based.
|
|
|
|
|

Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 8:30
|

|
|
jibegod posts:
And I always thought you were more oxygen/carbon based…
|
|
|
|
|

Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 8:33
|

|
|
wanderful posts:
| jibegod wrote: | | And I always thought you were more oxygen/carbon based… |
Everyone, meet the sumafi/sumari friend I was talking about. I have since been fit into those categories too!
|
|
|
|
|

Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 8:39
|

|
|
jibegod posts:
| wanderful wrote: | | jibegod wrote: | | And I always thought you were more oxygen/carbon based… |
Everyone, meet the sumafi/sumari friend I was talking about. I have since been fit into those categories too! |
If the shoe fits ^_^
|
|
|
|
|




Posted: Fri Jul 27, 2007 22:38
|

|
|
wanderful posts:
How sure are you of those stats rob?
|
|
|
|
|

|